Retrospective: The Sex Pistols, God Save The Queen
Retrospective: The Sex Pistols, God Save The Queen
Can music really generate controversy nowadays? Can one song have a massive impact on an entire country, leading to outrage, mainstream censorship and even alleged fixing of its entry in the music charts? Some music can. A lot depends on timing.
The timing of this now infamous single could not have been more controversial. Released on 27 May 1977, God Save The Queen was set to clash with the Queen’s Silver Jubilee celebrations. This was clearly a deliberate move on the part of Malcolm McDowell, the manager and one-man powerhouse behind The Sex Pistols. The band have always denied that the song was created because of the Jubilee. Again, going on past history with ingenious and often outrageous marketing strategies employed by McDowell, this is pretty hard to believe.
The lyrics also courted controversy. Johnny Rotten directly equated the Queen with “a fascist regime”, and claimed that Britain had “no future”. The Sex Pistols’ take on God Save The Queen is furiously anti-establishment and while the punk genre has now evolved to become quite poppy and sanitised in some respects, you can still hear a genuine fury behind Rotten’s spat-out, sneering sentiment. Would any band have the audacity to sing these lyrics and release a song like this right now? And most importantly, would anyone care? Punk music is traditionally equated with being anti-authoritarian, and this song is undoubtedly the most famous early example of the punk movement’s disaffection with traditional political systems.
“As a song, there is nothing revolutionary about it. Most people would agree that The Sex Pistols were on the whole rather poor musicians…As a moment in history however, this song could not have defined an era, a genre of music, a social and cultural movement, any better.”
As a song, there is nothing revolutionary about it. Most people would agree that The Sex Pistols were poor musicians, especially after the departure of Glen Matlock, and our Sex Pistols influenced Wildcard badge pays homage to this. As a moment in history however, this song could not have defined an era, a genre of music, a social and cultural movement, any better. It was banned from sale in many mainstream record stores, banned on BBC airwaves and on TV and banned by the Independent Broadcasting Authority which regulates independent local radio. Despite all this censorship, it landed at number two on the UK singles charts, beaten by Rod Stewart’s ironically titled ballad I Don’t Want To Talk About It. Some charts even refused to print what the song at number two was, instead representing it with a black line.
To this day there still remains a mystery about if it really was the biggest selling single in the UK at the time. Some commentators claim the result was ‘fixed’ to avoid offending the monarchy. Sales figures from singles were also compiled very differently in 1977. The charts only calculated the result from what was selling at a selection of record stores, and not all of them. This means that the result itself was probably not as accurate as it could have been. The BBC published an article in 2001 about the greatest song covers of all time and included this track, stating: “God Save The Queen reached number one in the UK in 1977 despite being banned by the BBC and marked a defining moment in the punk revolution.” The BBC have never confirmed or denied if this statement was an error or if the single did indeed top the official UK charts. This just adds to the impact this single had, and still has. The aura of mystery surrounding God Save The Queen‘s chart result is just brilliant; that alone is something that most music cannot hope to replicate. Unless of course, computer says no.
“…God Save The Queen deserves to be revered. God save The Sex Pistols; and God save us all. Pick up a guitar, bass, amp, sticks, use your voice or just use your fingers to pick up a pen and write – be inspired to start your own revolution.”
Chaos, anarchy, rebellion, revolution, spitting, swearing, ripped clothes, androgyny, bondage – punk was like no other musical movement that had come before, and indeed, few movements since. This single serves as a timely reminder of how powerful music can be. It really can cause governments and organisations to panic and flounder. The only sentiment I don’t agree with in the song is “No future”; on the contrary I find this song and everything it has achieved hugely inspirational. This time in 1977 there was a real revolution taking place in music, and by people who didn’t let the fact that they were not accomplished musicians stop them. Can we say the same now? No way. For that alone, God Save The Queen deserves to be revered. God save The Sex Pistols; and God save us all. Pick up a guitar, bass, amp, sticks, use your voice or just use your fingers to pick up a pen and write – be inspired to start your own revolution.
November 27, 2017
Hi, bit late to the party on this as only just joined up – great article – I’m curious as to where the notion of the Pistols as poor musicians has come from – I can see that this is attributed to ‘most’ people. An interesting thing to include. Thanks Andy
Report comment
November 27, 2017
Hi Andy, no problem and welcome to the Community 🙂
If you do a quick Google search, you’ll no doubt find countless reviews and opinions that agree with this school of thought and it’s also one the band spouted and celebrated themselves. John Lydon says he knew Sid Vicious had no talent in a 2005 interview, yet, both Lydon and McLaren wanted him in the band, the latter on the basis of his ‘perfect punk look’, which again underlines ideas of the ‘manufactured’ nature of the group. Essentially, God Save The Queen is a three chord rock song, and the majority of their songs never deviate from this rather pedestrian format. Compare this with the more innovative, genre-hopping punk that their contemporaries The Clash produced, and there’s no comparison.
This doesn’t mean that I or others think that the Pistols were rubbish though. I think the whole point of the brand of punk put forward by the Pistols was the chaotic DIY ethos, the fact that you didn’t need to be accomplished or even that talented to pick up an instrument and express your anger and frustration. It could be seen as a complete contrast to the whole prog rock scene which was trendy at the time. Dirty, sneering, spitting punks were the complete antithesis of prog and its well heeled hippies, blessed with an almost virtuoso level of musicianship. Amazing and much-needed in my opinion.
Hope this answers your question and feel free to disagree 🙂 On another note thanks for pointing out an error in my original article, I named Sid Vicious instead of Glen Matlock, d’oh!
Report comment
March 3, 2018
What I was thinking about recently was whether the sex pistols cared more about the lifestyle and the fashion sense more than their actual music. any thoughts?
Report comment
March 3, 2018
Hey Jonah, I’d agree with you to an extent. The Pistols were managed by Malcolm McLaren, who was an artist and fashion designer. He was a definite ‘hands on’ manager and controlled everything, from the band members, to their look/image/style, sound, media appearances, touring commitments, record deals and more. I guess his influence was very style-led. He wasn’t a musician himself and the music seemed to come second to the image/style of the band.
However, McLaren was into political movements when he was younger and The Pistols and the whole Punk movement can definitely be seen as a reaction against the more established Prog scene at the time (see my comment above). So yes, while I’d agree with you re the music, I would say that even though they weren’t amazing musicians, what they achieved for music and social/cultural awareness was phenomenal. I think Sam said you wouldn’t have had sub genres like pop-punk and Blink 182 without the Pistols….I think they showed you didn’t need to be a trained or even competent musician to be inspirational. I’m sure someone else will add what they think here too but you’ve raised a great question 🙂 Do you like any of their music?
Report comment
March 4, 2018
Cheers Michelle, thanks for your thoughts.
Personally I like “Anarchy for the UK” and “God Save The queen most.
Report comment
March 3, 2018
Hey Jonah!
Really good question actually. Even though I’m not that familiar with much of the Pistols’ work, I think their music said a lot for their time since they came off the back of the revolutionary era of music. Considering what the political climate was in 1977 it can be argued that they did care about their music since they did have a lot to express. However if you were to pick apart the ensemble of musicians they had then the latter would be true. But at the end of the day it’s punk. It’s a fast and an aggressive genre that wraps itself around 4 to 5 chords haha. Welcome to the community Jonah, really looking forward to seeing your work up on here! 🙂
Report comment
March 3, 2018
Really good point Mark! Fast, aggressive and limited range of chords… This is why it’s always best for a proper musician like yourself to reply aha 😉
Report comment
March 3, 2018
Cheers Mark, thanks for your opinion.
I guess you’re right, they did have a lot to express.
However, they were very much a manufactured band by Malcom McLaren, so “their” thoughts may just be what Malcom McLaren wanted them to think.
However, they were still a highly influential band who changed the face of music in only around 3 years.
Report comment